City of Chico: 47.6% less aeration energy per pound of oxygen demand, verified under a PG&E program

Aeration basin, City of Chico Water Pollution Control Plant
Aeration basin, City of Chico Water Pollution Control Plant.
PlantCity of Chico Water Pollution Control Plant, California
Size12 MGD design
PermitAmmonia removal
Control systemsSRTmaster (sludge age) since 2014; DO/Nmaster (airflow, dissolved oxygen and ammonia) since 2018
ResultA 2018 control project built around DO/Nmaster reduced aeration energy per pound of oxygen demand by 47.6%, with the existing blowers and diffusers
VerificationPost-installation verification by QuEST, an independent engineering firm, under PG&E's California Wastewater Process Optimization Program (August 2018)
Recognition2020 Water & Wastes Digest Top Project of the Year award for Automatic Ammonia Control, presented to Ekster & Associates

The plant

The City of Chico Water Pollution Control Plant has a design capacity of 12 million gallons a day. It treats domestic wastewater together with a significant brewery load, and its permit requires ammonia removal. The plant is staffed 8 hours a day; the activated sludge system operates unattended for the rest of the day.

The 2018 control project

The project installed the following measures, as listed in the verification report:

  • DO/Nmaster;
  • 15 automated valves;
  • 15 airflow meters;
  • 3 ammonia meters;
  • additional dissolved oxygen meters, from 6 to 15;
  • centrate storage with night-time injection;
  • improved blower sequencing.

The existing blowers and diffusers were not replaced. The additional instruments were paid for from the plant's operating budget.

Verified results

MeasureResult
Aeration power per pound of daily oxygen demand0.02392 kW before; 0.01254 kW after (47.6% reduction)
Verified electricity savings1,198,692 kWh a year
Electricity cost savings$168,051 a year, at 2018 rates
PG&E incentive paid to the City$121,208
Baseline period20 January – 10 February 2015
Post-installation periodJuly 2018

The results are normalized per pound of oxygen demand, so that changes in load are not counted as savings. The avoided emissions from the verified electricity savings are about 234 metric tons of CO₂e a year (EPA eGRID2023 factor for California, 430.0 lb CO₂e per MWh).

A benchmark

Chico's aeration energy is 580 kWh per million gallons treated, against an industry average of 800–1,500 kWh per million gallons, both for aeration energy only.

Control over time

  • 2014: SRTmaster began controlling sludge age. Sludge age targets are 9–10 days in summer and 10–12 days in winter.
  • 2018: DO/Nmaster began controlling airflow, dissolved oxygen and ammonia.
  • 2020: machine-learning control replaced the earlier model predictive control in DO/Nmaster.
  • 2021: the plant replaced its blowers. Energy figures that span the blower replacement are not presented as control results.
Ammonia analyzer and airflow instruments on an aeration basin at the City of Chico plant
Ammonia analyzer and airflow instruments on an aeration basin at the City of Chico plant.

Operators keep authority

Operators set the targets and limits within which DO/Nmaster and SRTmaster operate, and can override them at any time. Every reading is checked before it is used; faulty readings are detected and not acted on, and operators are alerted.

From the plant manager

"The performance of these systems has been exceptional, and they substantially helped the City increase performance and reliability of the Plant while reducing long term costs and maintaining regulatory compliance. I highly recommend Ekster and Associates' products and services."

James Carr, Plant Manager, City of Chico

Chico plant staff are available to speak with other utilities.

References

  • QuEST (2018). California Wastewater Process Optimization Program, Post-Installation Verification Report, City of Chico WWTF. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 29 August 2018.

Next step: a free plant assessment

Send one year of operating data and energy bills to info@srtcontrol.com. You will receive a written estimate of savings in kWh and dollars, the assumptions behind it, any changes required before installation, and a fixed price. If your plant is already operating efficiently, the estimate will say so.